TL;DR



Why is Northflank better?
| Feature | Northflank | Heroku |
|---|---|---|
| First-class container runtime | ||
| Preview environments that match your stack | ||
| MicroVM-based secure sandboxes | ||
| Bring-your-own-cloud | ||
| Autoscaling | ||
| GPU support | ||
| Per-second resource billing | ||
| Cron jobs and scheduled tasks built-in | ||
| Multi-region deployments | ||
| Infrastructure-as-code | ||
| Still shipping and caring about customers |
What you don’t get with Heroku
BYOC: run inside your own AWS/GCP/Azure account while keeping the platform experience.
Release strategies like blue/green and canary are explicitly supported in Northflank’s release tooling story.
Preview environments per branch or PR, with full-stack resources when you want them.
Build from Dockerfile or buildpacks.
Cost and predictability
| Feature | Northflank | Heroku |
|---|---|---|
| Network isolation | Included | Requires Private/Shield |
| Compliance features | Core platform | Higher tiers required |
| Infra cost visibility | Egress & disk shown | Abstracted |
| Private networking | No forced upgrade | Private Spaces required |
| BYOC | Yes | No |
| Cost predictability | Clear primitives | Bundled & opaque |
Migration
Deploy from Git using your Dockerfile or buildpacks.
Set up preview environments per PR/branch.
Add your databases and persistent services as project resources as you go.
Stay on Northflank cloud, or move workloads into your own cloud account with BYOC.
Security and isolation


If name-dropping helps, here you go.