TL;DR



Why is Northflank better?
| Feature | Northflank | Heroku |
|---|---|---|
| First-class container runtime | ||
| Preview environments that match your stack | ||
| MicroVM-based secure sandboxes | ||
| Bring-your-own-cloud | ||
| Autoscaling | ||
| GPU support | ||
| Per-second resource billing | ||
| Cron jobs and scheduled tasks built-in | ||
| Multi-region deployments | ||
| Infrastructure-as-code | ||
| Still shipping and caring about customers |
What you don’t get with Heroku
BYOC: run inside your own AWS/GCP/Azure account while keeping the platform experience.
Release strategies like blue/green and canary are explicitly supported in Northflank’s release tooling story.
Preview environments per branch or PR, with full-stack resources when you want them.
Build from Dockerfile or buildpacks.
Cost and predictability
| Feature | Northflank | Heroku |
|---|---|---|
| Network isolation | Included | Requires Private/Shield |
| Compliance features | Core platform | Higher tiers required |
| Infra cost visibility | Egress & disk shown | Abstracted |
| Private networking | No forced upgrade | Private Spaces required |
| BYOC | Yes | No |
| Cost predictability | Clear primitives | Bundled & opaque |
Migration
Deploy from Git using your Dockerfile or buildpacks.
Set up preview environments per PR/branch.
Add your databases and persistent services as project resources as you go.
Stay on Northflank cloud, or move workloads into your own cloud account with BYOC.
Security and isolation

