← Back to Blog
Header image for blog post: Open source LLMs: The complete developer's guide to choosing and deploying LLMs
Will Stewart
Published 16th July 2025

Open source LLMs: The complete developer's guide to choosing and deploying LLMs

Running your own language models is all about avoiding API costs and taking control of your AI infrastructure. This guide shows you exactly how to select, deploy, and scale open source LLMs for production use.

🎯 Quick start guide

  • Open source LLMs are language models with publicly available weights you can run on your own hardware
  • Top models: Llama 4, DeepSeek-V3, Qwen 3, and Mistral offer different performance/efficiency tradeoffs
  • Deployment complexity ranges from simple inference servers to full production stacks with autoscaling
  • Infrastructure is critical: The right platform can reduce deployment time from weeks to minutes

What is an open source LLM?

An open source Large Language Model (LLM) is a neural network trained for natural language processing tasks whose model weights, architecture specifications, and often training code are freely available for download and use. Unlike proprietary models accessed through APIs (like GPT-4 or Claude), open source LLMs can be:

  • Downloaded and run locally on your own hardware
  • Modified and fine-tuned for specific use cases
  • Deployed without usage restrictions (depending on license)
  • Integrated directly into your applications without API dependencies

Read more: Deploy Deepseek R1 on Northflank, in minutes.

Why should you use an open source LLM?

Complete data control: Your prompts and responses never leave your infrastructure. For industries handling sensitive data (healthcare, finance, legal) this isn't optional.

Predictable costs: No surprise bills from token usage spikes. Your costs are tied to infrastructure, not API calls.

Customization freedom: Fine-tune models on your domain-specific data. A base model becomes your specialized AI assistant.

Latency optimization: Deploy models close to your users. No round trips to external APIs mean faster response times.

No vendor dependencies: API changes, rate limits, or service outages won't break your application.

What is the best open Source LLM? A performance comparison

Choosing the best open source LLM depends on your specific requirements. Here's a comprehensive breakdown of leading models:

πŸ† Top open source LLMs by category

Best overall performance: Llama 4 Maverick

  • Parameters: 17B active (400B total MoE)
  • Strengths: Multimodal capabilities, excellent reasoning, strong coding
  • Context: 10M tokens (industry leading)
  • Use case: Production applications requiring frontier performance

Best for resource efficiency: Qwen 3 32B

  • Parameters: 32B
  • Strengths: Hybrid thinking modes, multilingual support
  • Context: 32K tokens
  • Use case: Complex reasoning tasks with moderate hardware

Best small model: Phi 3 Mini

  • Parameters: 3.8B
  • Strengths: Runs on consumer GPUs, fast inference
  • Context: 4K or 128K variants
  • Use case: Edge deployment, mobile applications

Best open alternative to GPT-4: DeepSeek-V3

  • Parameters: 671B
  • Strengths: Matches closed-source performance
  • Context: 128K tokens
  • Use case: Research and premium applications

Best for production balance: Mixtral 8x7B

  • Parameters: 46.7B (MoE architecture)
  • Strengths: Efficient inference, function calling
  • Context: 32K tokens
  • Use case: API services, chatbots

Performance benchmarks table

ModelSizeMMLU scoreHumanEvalInference speedVRAM Required
Llama 4 Maverick400B MoE88.692.8Moderate80GB+
DeepSeek-V3671B87.289.9Slow160GB+
Qwen 3 32B32B82.381.2Fast64GB
Mixtral 8x7B46.7B75.374.4Fast48GB
Phi 3 Mini3.8B68.862.2Very Fast8GB

How to run an open source LLM

Running an open source LLM involves several key steps. Here's a practical guide to get you started:

Step 1: Choose your deployment method

Local development (quick testing):

# Using Hugging Face Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

model_name = "microsoft/Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct"
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)

Production inference server (recommended):

# Using vLLM for optimized serving
docker run --gpus all \
  -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \
  -p 8000:8000 \
  vllm/vllm-openai:latest \
  --model mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1

Step 2: Optimize for production

Quantization reduces model size and speeds up inference:

# 4-bit quantization example
from transformers import BitsAndBytesConfig

quantization_config = BitsAndBytesConfig(
    load_in_4bit=True,
    bnb_4bit_compute_dtype=torch.float16
)

Batching improves throughput:

  • Use inference servers like vLLM or TGI
  • Configure dynamic batching for optimal GPU utilization
  • Monitor queue depths and adjust batch sizes

Step 3: Build your API layer

Create a production-ready API wrapper:

from fastapi import FastAPI
from pydantic import BaseModel

app = FastAPI()

class CompletionRequest(BaseModel):
    prompt: str
    max_tokens: int = 100
    temperature: float = 0.7

@app.post("/completions")
async def generate(request: CompletionRequest):
    # Your inference logic here
    return {"completion": generated_text}

Step 4: Handle production challenges

Memory management:

  • Use model sharding for large models
  • Implement proper garbage collection
  • Monitor VRAM usage continuously

Performance optimization:

  • Enable Flash Attention for longer contexts
  • Use tensor parallelism for multi-GPU setups
  • Implement caching for repeated queries

Reliability:

  • Add health checks and automatic restarts
  • Implement request queuing and backpressure
  • Set up proper logging and monitoring

The infrastructure challenge (why deployment matters)

Here's where most teams hit a wall. You've selected your model, optimized inference, built your API, but production deployment introduces new complexities:

Common production requirements

Autoscaling: Your lunch-hour traffic might be 10x your morning load. Manual scaling isn't sustainable.

Multi-region deployment: Users expect low latency. Deploying models globally requires sophisticated orchestration.

Zero-downtime Updates: Model improvements shouldn't mean service interruptions.

Cost optimization: GPUs are expensive. Inefficient utilization directly impacts your bottom line.

Observability: You need visibility into inference latency, error rates, and resource utilization.

Traditional approach vs. modern solutions

Building this infrastructure from scratch typically requires:

  • Kubernetes expertise for orchestration
  • Custom CI/CD pipelines for model updates
  • Monitoring stack setup and maintenance
  • Load balancer configuration
  • GPU scheduling optimization

This represents months of engineering work before you can focus on your actual AI application.

Simplifying LLM deployment with Northflank

Modern platforms eliminate this infrastructure complexity. Here's how a production-ready deployment actually looks:

Container-based model deployment

Package your LLM with its dependencies:

FROM nvidia/cuda:12.1-base
RUN pip install vllm transformers
COPY . /app
CMD ["python", "-m", "vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server", \
     "--model", "mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1"]

Deploy with automatic GPU provisioning, load balancing, and monitoring, all handled by the platform.

Real-world scale example

Consider how Weights scaled their AI platform:

  • 250+ concurrent GPUs across multiple clouds
  • 500,000+ inference runs daily
  • Multi-cloud deployment (AWS, GCP, Azure)
  • Managed by a small team without dedicated DevOps

This scale would typically require a full infrastructure team. With the right platform, it's achievable by a few engineers focused on product development.

How Northflank scales with your needs

Start small, scale smart: Northflank's platform adapts to your growth:

  • Begin with a single GPU for prototyping
  • Scale to hundreds of GPUs across regions
  • Mix on-demand and spot instances for cost optimization
  • No infrastructure rewrite as you grow

Global GPU availability: Deploy where your users are:

  • GPUs available in 15+ regions worldwide
  • Automatic failover between availability zones
  • No vendor lock-in or regional contracts
  • Same deployment experience everywhere

The combination of BYOC flexibility and managed GPU access means you can optimize for both compliance requirements and cost efficiency without compromise.

Best practices for open source LLM deployment

Model selection checklist

  • βœ… Verify license compatibility with your use case
  • βœ… Benchmark on your specific tasks, not just general benchmarks
  • βœ… Consider total cost of ownership, not just model performance
  • βœ… Test quantized versions for better efficiency
  • βœ… Evaluate ecosystem support and documentation

Getting started today

The gap between experimenting with open source LLMs and running them in production doesn't have to be insurmountable. Here's your action plan:

  1. Start small: Deploy Phi 3 Mini for initial testing
  2. Measure everything: Establish baselines for latency and cost
  3. Scale gradually: Move to larger models as needed
  4. Optimize continuously: Monitor usage patterns and adjust

For teams ready to move beyond notebooks, platforms like Northflank provide the infrastructure layer that makes production deployment accessible. No Kubernetes expertise required, just your model and a Dockerfile.

Conclusion

Open source LLMs represent a fundamental shift in how we build AI applications. The technology is ready; the models rival proprietary alternatives; the tooling ecosystem is maturing rapidly.

The question isn't whether to use open source LLMs, it's how quickly you can move from experimentation to production. With the right approach and infrastructure, that journey is shorter than ever.

Ready to deploy your first open source LLM? Try Northflank today.

Share this article with your network
X