← Back to Blog
Header image for blog post: Best code execution sandbox for AI agents in 2026
Cristina Bunea
Published 17th January 2026

Best code execution sandbox for AI agents in 2026

TL;DR: Best code execution sandbox for AI agents in 2026

The best code execution sandbox for AI agents depends on what your agent runs, how many environments it needs at once, and what must survive between tasks:

  1. Northflank: Best for AI agent code execution in sandboxes at high concurrency. A fit for teams that want sandboxes designed for AI agents to execute AI-generated code, with fast startup, support for thousands of concurrent sessions, and custom environments for coding agents, APIs, and GPU tasks.
  2. E2B: Best for agent-oriented execution workflows. A fit for teams whose agents return to the same sandbox across tasks, with pause/resume to preserve state and session and concurrency limits that vary by plan.
  3. Modal: Best for programmatic compute and GPU workflows. A fit for teams configuring sandbox environments through SDKs, using custom images, and running compute-intensive agent tasks.
  4. Together Code Sandbox: Best for resumable development environments. A fit for agents that return to workspaces with memory and disk state preserved through hibernation.
  5. Vercel Sandbox: Best for applications using Vercel. Provides isolated code execution with Firecracker microVMs and plan-based session limits.

To try your agent’s workload in a sandbox, follow the Northflank sandbox quickstart. Create an account to run your first task, or book a demo to discuss sandbox concurrency, isolation, and deployment requirements.

What is a code execution sandbox for AI agents?

A code execution sandbox is an isolated environment where an AI agent can run generated code, install dependencies, manipulate files, and return results. The sandbox supplies the execution boundary; the agent decides which actions to take. For the interfaces your application uses to send commands, stream output, and collect results, see our guide to code execution APIs for AI agents.

For example, a coding agent might clone a repository, change a function, run the test suite, and inspect failures inside one sandbox. An API-building agent might start a generated server and send requests to it. A data agent might execute Python against uploaded files and return a chart.

These tasks need more than a function that evaluates a code snippet. They may require shell access, background processes, custom system packages, accessible ports, or persistent files.

Isolation reduces the impact of buggy or malicious code, but it does not make credentials or network access safe automatically. Give each sandbox only the permissions and data its task needs.

Which sandbox should you choose for your AI agent?

Start with the execution requirements, then compare providers against them.

Agent workloadWhat the sandbox needsWhat to test
Coding agentRepository access, shell commands, dependencies, test runnersCan it finish your real build and test cycle?
Generated API or web appLong-running processes, ports, request routingCan the agent start a server and verify responses?
Code interpreterFile input/output and an appropriate language runtimeDo outputs and errors return reliably?
Browser automationBrowser binaries, system dependencies, sufficient memoryCan parallel sessions complete without resource contention?
GPU-assisted taskCompatible GPU, drivers, and isolation runtimeIs the required hardware available in your region?
Multi-user agent productPer-session isolation, lifecycle controls, burst capacityWhat happens when many users start tasks together?

For a production agent, measure the whole loop: create sandbox → prepare workspace → execute → collect results → clean up. A fast provisioning response is useful only if the agent can start doing work shortly afterward.

Code execution sandbox comparison for AI agents

Compare each sandbox’s execution model, persistence, and limits against the tasks your AI agent needs to complete.

ProviderRecommended use caseIsolationSession limits and persistence
NorthflankAI agent code execution at high concurrencyManaged CPU sandboxes: microVMs; GPU sandboxes: gVisorNo fixed session time limit; attached volumes preserve files across restarts and pauses, but pausing stops processes
E2BAgent execution with pause/resumeFirecracker microVMsHobby: 1 hour; Pro: 24 hours; longer enterprise sessions. Normal pause preserves files and memory
ModalProgrammatic sandbox and GPU workflowsgVisor; CPU-only VM Sandboxes in betaDefault 5 minutes, configurable up to 24 hours; filesystem snapshots support recovery in another sandbox
Together Code SandboxResumable development environmentsFirecracker microVMsHibernation preserves memory and disk state for later resume
Vercel SandboxSandboxed execution for Vercel applicationsFirecracker microVMsHobby: 45 minutes; Pro/Enterprise: 24 hours per session; filesystem snapshots preserve files between sessions

Check session limits, hardware availability, and concurrency allowances for the plan you intend to use.

Best code execution sandboxes for AI agents in 2026

These five providers cover coding agents, generated applications, and other isolated execution workloads.

1. Northflank: Best for AI agent code execution in sandboxes at high concurrency

Northflank runs isolated sandboxes for coding agents, code interpreters, generated applications, and parallel execution jobs. You can use the same sandbox workflow for a short script, a test suite, or an API that needs to keep running while an agent works on it.

  • Startup speed and concurrency: Northflank Sandboxes support thousands of concurrent agent sessions, with sub-second sandbox boot times on Northflank Cloud. Use them for parallel agent tasks, test runs, and isolated user sessions.
  • Custom images and execution tools: Package your language runtime, build tools, and dependencies in a container image. JavaScript and Python clients support sandbox creation, command execution, file transfers, and cleanup, as shown in the sandbox quickstart.
  • CPU and GPU isolation: On Northflank’s managed cloud, CPU sandboxes use microVMs and GPU sandboxes use gVisor. Isolation is selected automatically for the workload; GPU availability depends on the region.
  • Deployment options: Use Northflank’s managed infrastructure or bring your own cloud (BYOC), where Northflank acts as the control plane to run coding agents and their sandboxes in your virtual private cloud (VPC). Sandbox isolation requires a supported runtime configured in your cluster.
  • Session duration and persistent files: Sandboxes have no fixed session timeout, and attached volumes preserve files across restarts. Pausing stops processes and terminal sessions and deletes ephemeral data, while retaining configuration and attached volumes. Resume restarts the environment without restoring process memory.

Follow the quickstart to create a sandbox and run your agent’s first task. Create an account to test your workload, or book a demo to plan for production concurrency and isolation requirements.

Choose Northflank when: you need fast, concurrent sandboxes for several kinds of agent tasks, with custom images, persistent storage, and control over where agent code executes.

2. E2B: Best for agent-oriented execution workflows

E2B provides sandboxes designed for AI-generated code, with session controls for agents that return to an environment across multiple tasks.

  • Session duration: Hobby sessions can run for one hour and Pro sessions for 24 hours. Enterprise offers longer-lived sessions.
  • Pause and resume: A normally paused sandbox resumes with its files and memory state preserved. Filesystem-only pause preserves files but reboots on resume, so processes and memory state are lost. Session timeout and concurrency limits depend on your plan.
  • Managed concurrency: Hobby includes 20 concurrent sandboxes and Pro includes 100. Paid concurrency add-ons increase Pro capacity to 1,100; Enterprise offers higher capacity.
  • Networking and deployment: The enterprise offering includes network access controls and bring your own cloud (BYOC) options for AWS and GCP.

Choose E2B when: its agent execution model fits your application and the selected plan covers your concurrency and session requirements. For longer workflows, decide whether you need continuous execution or can pause between tasks.

3. Modal: Best for programmatic compute and GPU workflows

Modal supports programmatically configured sandboxes for agent tasks, including workloads that need GPU compute.

  • Custom environments: Create sandboxes through SDKs, configure dependencies, and use existing container images.
  • Session limits and recovery: Sandboxes have a default five-minute timeout, configurable up to 24 hours. Filesystem snapshots let an agent continue from saved files in another sandbox.
  • VM isolation option: VM Sandboxes provide a real Linux kernel in beta. This option is CPU-only and should be evaluated separately from GPU configurations.
  • GPU execution and billing: Choose GPU resources for tasks that need accelerated computation. CPU and memory billing uses the greater of requested and actual usage.

Choose Modal when: you want to manage execution environments programmatically and its compute model fits your agent. Test the exact runtime, snapshot behavior, and hardware combination you plan to deploy.

4. Together Code Sandbox: Best for resumable development environments

Together Code Sandbox provides development environments for agents that repeatedly return to the same workspace.

  • Workspace persistence: Hibernation preserves memory and disk state, supporting workflows that resume with their tools and dependencies in place.
  • Application previews: Preview ports let agents expose and inspect applications running in the environment.
  • Startup and resume: Together reports a 2.7-second P95 cold start and a 500-millisecond P95 resume. These measure different operations; compare cold starts and resumes separately.

Choose Together Code Sandbox when: resuming an existing development environment is central to the agent workflow. Confirm current access, pricing, SDK requirements, and workspace limits for your deployment.

5. Vercel Sandbox: Best for applications using Vercel

Vercel Sandbox provides isolated execution for generated code and is worth evaluating for applications already using Vercel.

  • Isolation: Sandboxes use Firecracker microVMs to isolate code execution.
  • Session duration: Hobby sessions have a 45-minute limit; Pro and Enterprise sessions can run for 24 hours. Resuming starts a new timeout window, so session duration differs from total sandbox lifetime.
  • Concurrency: Pro and Enterprise support up to 10,000 concurrent sandboxes, subject to the plan’s documented limits.
  • Usage costs: Include active CPU, provisioned memory, sandbox creation, data transfer, snapshot storage, and drive storage and operations when estimating your agent’s execution costs.

Choose Vercel Sandbox when: its developer workflow fits your application and its session model covers your tasks. Account for idle memory and retained storage as well as active execution.

How much do code execution sandboxes cost?

Compare the total cost of a completed agent task, including setup, idle time, retries, and stored state. The lowest CPU rate alone does not determine the cheapest workflow.

Prices below are in USD as of September 28, 2026, with per-second rates converted to hourly equivalents.

ProviderCPU rateMemory rateImportant billing distinction
Northflank$0.01667/vCPU-hour$0.00833/GB-hourCompute billed per second; storage and egress separate
E2B$0.0504/vCPU-hour$0.0162/GiB-hourPro subscription is additional to usage
Modal Sandboxes$0.1419/physical-core-hour$0.0240/GiB-hourA physical core represents two vCPUs; sandbox rates differ from other compute rates
Vercel Sandbox$0.128/active-CPU-hour$0.0212/GB-hourExample rates for iad1; region and other usage affect cost
Together Code Sandbox$0.0446/vCPU-hour$0.0149/GiB-hourCPU and memory are charged separately

GB and GiB measure memory differently, and a physical core is not the same billing unit as a vCPU. Some providers charge for allocated resources; others meter active CPU. Include these differences, storage, and network charges when estimating your total.

How to evaluate a sandbox before committing

Use a small workload suite drawn from your actual agents. Include a normal task, a resource-heavy task, a long-running task, and a task that fails.

  1. Measure readiness under load. Record time to the first successful command at normal and peak concurrency. Track failures and P95/P99 latency as well as the median.
  2. Check execution compatibility. Run your real language runtimes, package installation, browser dependencies, and test commands. Verify how subprocesses and servers behave.
  3. Test session recovery. Pause, resume, restart, and expire a sandbox. Check files, process memory, open connections, and agent state separately.
  4. Verify access boundaries. Attempt connections that should be allowed and blocked. Confirm that one session cannot read another session’s credentials or files.
  5. Measure cost per completed task. Include failures, retries, idle periods, persistent storage, and cleanup. Estimate burst usage separately from steady-state usage.

Keep the image, region, concurrency level, and measurement definitions consistent. Comparing a warm resume against a cold start can produce an attractive number without answering how your agent will perform.

Get started with Northflank Sandboxes

The Northflank sandbox quickstart provides JavaScript and Python examples for creating an environment, executing commands, working with files, and cleaning up.

To evaluate your first agent task:

  1. Create a Northflank account and project.
  2. Choose an image containing the runtime and tools your task requires.
  3. Create a sandbox with suitable CPU and memory resources.
  4. Run the agent’s commands and capture outputs, errors, and generated files.
  5. Add persistent storage if subsequent sessions need those files, then test cleanup and recovery.

Repeat the task at your expected concurrency before moving production traffic. For bring your own cloud (BYOC), Northflank acts as the control plane to run coding agents and their sandboxes in your virtual private cloud (VPC). Follow the sandbox runtime configuration guide to configure isolation for that deployment.

Start running sandboxes or talk to Northflank about your workload, isolation requirements, and target concurrency.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best code execution sandbox for AI agents?

Northflank is our recommendation for teams combining varied agent workloads with high concurrency and flexible deployment. E2B, Modal, Together Code Sandbox, and Vercel Sandbox are also worth evaluating. Choose using your workload’s runtime, persistence, isolation, and cost requirements, then validate with real tasks.

Can an AI sandbox run an API or a full application?

Yes, if it supports the necessary runtime, long-running processes, and network ports. A sandbox used only for short code snippets may not meet those needs. Test server startup, request handling, authentication, and shutdown as part of your evaluation.

Is pausing a sandbox the same as preserving its memory?

No. Some implementations preserve process memory; others stop processes and retain only configuration or persistent files. Check the provider’s documented behavior for the exact sandbox type. Your agent may need to recreate shell sessions, reconnect clients, or restart tools after resuming.

Are microVMs enough to secure agent-generated code?

MicroVMs provide an isolation boundary, but secure execution also depends on permissions, resource limits, network controls, and credential handling. A sandbox can still misuse an API key you intentionally give it. Limit access to what the task requires and monitor execution.

Can I run GPU tasks inside a sandbox?

Yes. Northflank and Modal offer GPU sandbox options. Hardware availability and isolation differ by configuration. Confirm the required GPU, region, drivers, and runtime before choosing an environment.

What is the difference between bring your own cloud (BYOC) and self-hosting?

Bring your own cloud (BYOC) runs workloads in your cloud account while the provider manages agreed parts of the service. With self-hosting, your team deploys and operates the software, including maintenance and upgrades.

Share this article with your network
X