← Back to Blog
Header image for blog post: What is AWS Fargate?
Will Stewart
Published 9th June 2025

What is AWS Fargate?

AWS Fargate is a serverless compute engine for containers that eliminates the need to provision and manage servers. But like most AWS products, its simplicity is skin-deep. Fargate sits inside a complex web of AWS services, opinions, and limitations. It’s great for what it is, but it’s not the only option. And depending on your use case, Northflank might be a better one.

This guide breaks it all down:

  • What is AWS Fargate?
  • How does it actually work?
  • ECS vs Fargate, what’s the difference?
  • Pros and cons (especially for engineering teams that care about performance, cost, and velocity)
  • Why platforms like Northflank give you the power of Fargate with fewer trade-offs

Let’s get into it.

What is AWS Fargate?

AWS Fargate is a container runtime. It’s part of the Amazon ECS (Elastic Container Service) and EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Service) ecosystems. You give Fargate a container image, specify your CPU and memory requirements, and it handles the provisioning of the underlying compute infrastructure.

Think of it as AWS’s answer to “Just run my container.”

Key features:

  • Serverless execution model: No need to manage EC2 instances.
  • Per-second billing: Pay for only what you use.
  • Tight integration with ECS and EKS: Fargate is not a standalone product; it’s a launch type for ECS or a runtime profile for EKS.
  • Scales automatically: AWS handles provisioning and scaling of compute resources.

You get a lot of abstraction, but also a lot of AWS lock-in.

How does AWS Fargate work?

Under the hood, Fargate is orchestrating isolated Firecracker microVMs for each task or pod. Firecracker is a lightweight virtualization technology (also used by Lambda) that spins up secure, fast-booting VMs. Fargate abstracts this completely. You don’t see the VMs, but they’re there.

The execution lifecycle looks like this:

  1. You define a task definition in ECS or a pod spec in EKS.
  2. Specify resource requirements (CPU/memory), networking mode, IAM roles, logging, etc.
  3. You run the task or deploy the pod.
  4. Fargate pulls the container image and launches it inside a Firecracker microVM.
  5. Logs go to CloudWatch. Metrics go to CloudWatch. Secrets and configs come from Parameter Store, Secrets Manager, or injected via task definitions.

The entire lifecycle is invisible, which is great for speed—but opaque for debugging.

ECS vs Fargate: What’s the difference?

This question confuses a lot of teams. Fargate is not an alternative to ECS, it’s a compute backend for ECS.

AWS ECS (Elastic Container Service):

  • A container orchestration service.
  • Manages how containers are scheduled, run, and scaled.
  • You can use ECS with EC2 (your own instances) or Fargate (serverless backend).

AWS Fargate:

  • A launch type (in ECS) or profile (in EKS).
  • Executes containers in isolated microVMs.
  • Removes the need to manage EC2 nodes.

TL;DR:

  • ECS is the orchestrator.
  • Fargate is the compute engine.

You can think of it like this:

  • ECS + EC2 = You manage the infrastructure.
  • ECS + Fargate = AWS manages the infrastructure.

What are the pros of AWS Fargate?

Fargate makes a lot of sense in specific scenarios, especially when teams want to avoid infrastructure overhead.

✅ Simplicity

  • No need to configure EC2 instances.
  • No autoscaling groups, AMIs, or SSH.
  • No capacity planning.

✅ Security isolation

  • Each container gets its own VM-level isolation.
  • More secure than shared-node models.

✅ Granular cost control

  • Pay per second, per task.
  • Fine-tune CPU and memory.

✅ Deep AWS integration

  • IAM roles for tasks.
  • CloudWatch logs and metrics.
  • Private networking (VPC native).

✅ Good for event-driven workloads

  • Great fit for bursty traffic.
  • Use with Lambda-style architectures where workloads are short-lived.

What are the cons of AWS Fargate?

This is where the shine wears off. Fargate has serious limitations, some technical, some practical.

❌ Cost

  • Expensive at scale.
    • Always-on workloads are much cheaper on EC2 or other platforms.
    • You pay for idle time between container startups.
  • No instance-based pricing efficiency.

❌ Cold starts

  • Containers take time to spin up.
  • Cold start latency can be several seconds.
  • Not ideal for latency-sensitive services.

❌ Opaque debugging

  • No access to the host.
  • Difficult to troubleshoot issues that aren’t in the container logs.
  • No SSH or live debugging.

❌ Limited customization

  • No access to kernel-level configs or advanced networking.
  • Can’t run privileged containers or custom runtimes.

❌ Vendor lock-in

  • Entire deployment model tied to AWS ECS or EKS.
  • Migrating off Fargate requires rewriting infrastructure.

Who should use Fargate (and who shouldn’t)

Good fit

  • Small teams without infra expertise.
  • Event-driven systems.
  • Periodic batch jobs or scripts.
  • Short-lived tasks (e.g. jobs kicked off via API or queue).

Poor fit

  • Latency-sensitive applications.
  • High-throughput services with sustained load.
  • Large-scale multi-tenant platforms.
  • Teams that need deep observability, debugging, or fine-grained control.

Northflank as an alternative to AWS Fargate

northflank-container-orchestration.png

Fargate solves a narrow set of problems, but leaves you boxed into AWS. Northflank gives you the same “just run my container” experience, but with more control, better observability, and none of the platform sprawl.

Key advantages of Northflank

🚀 Git-based deployments

  • Native CI/CD via Git push.
  • No need to configure pipelines separately.
  • Faster iteration loop for developers.

🔍 Built-in observability

  • Live logs and metrics without extra setup.
  • No jumping between services like CloudWatch, X-Ray, or OpenSearch.

⚙️ Real infrastructure control

  • Access to container-level configurations.
  • Optional use of microVMs (for secure isolation) or standard containers (for speed).

🧩 Workload-level abstractions

  • Services, jobs, cron, previews, all first-class primitives.
  • Not bolted-on like in ECS.

🔄 Faster startup times

  • No multi-second cold starts.
  • Containers boot fast, even with microVM isolation.

🛡️ Isolation without complexity

  • Choose between container-based or microVM-based isolation.
  • Runs hardened by default, no need to manually set seccomp/apparmor profiles.

🌍 Multi-cloud and self-host options

  • Don’t want to be tied to AWS? You don’t have to be.
  • Run in your own VPC, across clouds, or even on-prem.

💰 Predictable pricing

  • No hidden costs.
  • Built for sustained workloads, not spiky jobs.
  • Cheaper than Fargate at scale.

Final thoughts

AWS Fargate is a smart engineering solution built to simplify container infrastructure. For certain jobs, it’s the right tool. But most engineering teams don’t just need “less infrastructure,” they need a better platform. One that balances ease of use with deep control. One that doesn't sacrifice observability. One that helps them ship, debug, and scale without wrestling with the guts of AWS.

Want to learn more about how Northflank compares to AWS Fargate, ECS, or EKS? Talk to us or spin up your first service in minutes. It’s free to try.

Share this article with your network
X