← Back to Blog
Header image for blog post: Top 13 Pulumi alternatives in 2025
Deborah Emeni
Published 3rd November 2025

Top 13 Pulumi alternatives in 2025

TL;DR: Pulumi alternatives at a glance

Pulumi alternatives range from traditional Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tools to complete platform solutions that handle infrastructure, deployment, and operations together. Here are the top options:

  1. Northflank - Kubernetes-native platform with Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) support (deploy in your own AWS, Azure, GCP, Civo, Oracle, or bare-metal/on-premise), integrated CI/CD, databases, and zero vendor lock-in. Complete deployment solution beyond infrastructure provisioning.
  2. Terraform - IaC tool using HCL language with large ecosystem, though now under Business Source License.
  3. OpenTofu - Open-source Terraform fork under Linux Foundation with full Terraform compatibility and community governance.
  4. AWS CDK - Code infrastructure for AWS using TypeScript, Python, or other languages, but AWS-only.
  5. Crossplane - Kubernetes-native IaC using CRDs and GitOps workflows for teams already running Kubernetes.
  6. Ansible - Agentless automation using YAML playbooks, better for configuration management than complex infrastructure.
  7. Azure Bicep - Modern DSL for Azure resources, cleaner than ARM templates but Azure-specific.
  8. CDK for Terraform - Write Terraform infrastructure in programming languages instead of HCL.
  9. AWS CloudFormation - AWS-native templates in YAML/JSON with deep service integration.
  10. Azure ARM Templates - Microsoft's JSON-based IaC for Azure (Bicep is recommended modern alternative).
  11. Chef - Ruby-based configuration management for traditional infrastructure.
  12. Puppet - Declarative configuration management with agent-based architecture.
  13. Vagrant - Tool for building and managing virtualized development environments with simple configuration.

What to look out for in Pulumi alternatives?

When evaluating alternatives to Pulumi, look out for these factors based on common pain points teams experience:

  • Do I need more than just infrastructure provisioning? If you're looking for a complete platform that handles deployment, CI/CD, databases, and operations alongside infrastructure management, look out for platforms rather than point tools.
  • How important is keeping data within my security boundary? For regulated industries requiring strict data residency and compliance controls, look for solutions with built-in Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) capabilities rather than SaaS-only state management.
  • What's my team's technical background? Developer-heavy teams may prefer programming languages, while operations-focused teams often work better with declarative DSLs or managed platforms.
  • Can I avoid vendor lock-in? Check whether the tool uses open standards like Kubernetes and Docker, or proprietary SDKs and languages that make migration difficult.
  • What are the total costs at scale? Look beyond free tiers and understand pricing models based on resources, users, or compute usage to avoid surprises as you grow.
  • Will this tool grow with my team? Check if the solution supports multi-cloud deployments, handles increasing complexity, and provides the right level of abstraction for your current and future needs

13 best Pulumi alternatives for cloud infrastructure management in 2025

These alternatives fall into three categories: complete platforms that handle more than just provisioning, multi-cloud IaC tools, and cloud-specific solutions.

1. Northflank

Best for: Teams needing a complete deployment platform with features to help meet compliance standards (Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC)), CI/CD pipelines, managed databases, multi-cloud support, and zero vendor lock-in, all without infrastructure complexity

Northflank takes a different approach than traditional IaC tools by providing a complete platform for deploying and operating applications, beyond provisioning infrastructure. Built on standard Kubernetes, it abstracts complexity while maintaining portability.

The platform's Bring Your Own Cloud model addresses compliance requirements by keeping all runtime, data, and logs within your cloud boundary across AWS, GCP, Azure, Civo, Oracle, or on-premise/bare-metal.

Because Northflank runs on standard Kubernetes and Docker, you avoid vendor lock-in. Your applications remain portable and can be exported to run on any Kubernetes cluster. This contrasts with tools that use proprietary SDKs or domain-specific languages, which require code rewrites for migration.

northflank's-ai-homepage.png

Key capabilities:

Teams like Weights have scaled to millions of users running 10,000+ AI training jobs daily with minimal infrastructure overhead using this approach.

Northflank works well for developer teams wanting to ship applications quickly, organizations with strict compliance requirements, and companies running workloads or AI/ML applications (both CPU & GPU) across multiple clouds.

Pricing: Free developer tier, usage-based pricing for production workloads

(See full pricing details)

2. Terraform

Best for: Organizations using HCL-based infrastructure automation

Terraform uses HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL) to define infrastructure across multiple cloud providers. The 2023 license change to Business Source License means it's no longer fully open-source, creating restrictions for some commercial use cases.

terraform-by-hashicorp.png

Key features:

  • Declarative HCL syntax
  • Execution planning (terraform plan)
  • Multi-cloud provider support
  • Module registry with community contributions
  • State management with remote backends
  • Infrastructure drift detection

License: Business Source License v1.1

3. OpenTofu

Best for: Teams wanting fully open-source Terraform compatibility

OpenTofu is a community fork of Terraform governed by the Linux Foundation, maintaining full compatibility with Terraform configurations while remaining open-source. Built-in state encryption adds security without external tools.

opentofu.png

Key features:

  • Full Terraform compatibility
  • Community governance under Linux Foundation
  • Built-in state encryption
  • Enhanced security features
  • Access to 3,900+ providers and 23,600+ modules
  • Advanced workflow capabilities

License: Mozilla Public License v2.0

4. AWS CDK

Best for: AWS-native applications using programming languages

AWS Cloud Development Kit lets developers define AWS infrastructure using TypeScript, Python, Java, C#, or Go. Code synthesizes into CloudFormation templates for deployment, limited to AWS only.

aws-cdk.png

Key features:

  • Multiple language support (TypeScript, Python, Java, C#, Go)
  • Construct library (L1-L3 abstractions)
  • Automatic synthesis to CloudFormation
  • Native AWS service integration
  • Built-in testing support
  • IDE integration with autocomplete and type checking

License: Apache License 2.0

5. Crossplane

Best for: Platform teams managing infrastructure through Kubernetes

Crossplane extends Kubernetes to manage cloud infrastructure using Custom Resource Definitions. Platform engineers can define custom infrastructure APIs for developers to consume.

crossplane-homepage.png

Key features:

  • Kubernetes-native design (infrastructure as CRDs)
  • GitOps compatible
  • Custom infrastructure APIs through compositions
  • Multi-cloud support (AWS, Azure, GCP, Alibaba Cloud)
  • Declarative configuration
  • Separation of concerns between platform and developers

License: Apache License 2.0

6. Ansible

Best for: Agentless automation and configuration tasks

Ansible uses YAML playbooks for automation without requiring agent installation on managed nodes. Procedural execution and less sophisticated state management make it less suitable for complex infrastructure compared to tools purpose-built for IaC.

ansible's website.png

Key features:

  • Agentless architecture (SSH/WinRM)
  • YAML-based playbooks
  • Wide ecosystem of modules
  • Procedural execution model
  • Simple learning curve
  • Orchestration capabilities

License: GNU GPL v3.0

7. Azure Bicep

Best for: Azure deployments needing cleaner syntax than ARM templates

Microsoft developed Bicep to address ARM template verbosity, transpiling to ARM JSON at runtime. Limited to Azure infrastructure only.

azure-bicep.png

Key features:

  • Concise, human-readable syntax
  • Full ARM template compatibility
  • Native Azure support with same-day feature access
  • Built-in IDE tooling and validation
  • Modular and reusable design
  • Type safety and IntelliSense support

License: MIT License

8. CDK for Terraform

Best for: Developers wanting Terraform providers with programming languages

CDKTF combines Terraform's provider ecosystem with code-based infrastructure definitions in TypeScript, Python, Java, C#, or Go. Code compiles into standard Terraform JSON, maintaining compatibility with Terraform workflows.

cdk-for-teraform.png

Key features:

  • Multiple language support (TypeScript, Python, Java, C#, Go)
  • Terraform compatibility and provider ecosystem
  • Type safety and IDE integration
  • Programming language constructs (loops, conditionals, functions)
  • Compiles to standard Terraform JSON
  • Access to Terraform modules

License: Mozilla Public License v2.0

9. AWS CloudFormation

Best for: AWS-only infrastructure with native service integration

CloudFormation is AWS's native IaC using YAML or JSON templates with first-party support for AWS services. Templates can be verbose and lack programming constructs.

aws-cloudformation.png

Key features:

  • AWS-native with first-party support
  • Declarative templates in YAML/JSON
  • Automatic dependency resolution
  • Change sets for preview
  • Drift detection
  • Stack management and rollback capabilities

License: Proprietary (free to use)

10. Azure ARM Templates

Best for: Legacy Azure deployments (Bicep now recommended)

ARM Templates define Azure infrastructure using JSON with native platform integration. Microsoft now recommends Bicep for new deployments due to ARM's verbose syntax.

azurea-arm-templates.png

Key features:

  • Native Azure integration
  • JSON-based declarative syntax
  • Idempotent deployments
  • Integration with Azure policies and RBAC
  • Template validation and what-if analysis
  • Secure parameter handling

License: Proprietary

11. Chef

Best for: Traditional infrastructure configuration

Chef automates infrastructure setup using Ruby-based DSL with procedural and imperative approaches. Requires Ruby knowledge and uses agent-based architecture.

chef-homepage.png

Key features:

  • Ruby-based DSL
  • Procedural and imperative approach
  • Agent-based architecture
  • Configuration enforcement
  • Test-driven infrastructure development
  • Cookbook sharing and reuse

License: Apache License 2.0

12. Puppet

Best for: Large-scale server configuration

Puppet enforces system configuration using declarative language and agent-master architecture. Designed for consistent configuration across server fleets rather than cloud provisioning.

puppet.png

Key features:

  • Declarative configuration model
  • Agent-master architecture
  • State enforcement and drift correction
  • Module ecosystem (Puppet Forge)
  • Reporting and compliance tracking
  • Multi-platform support

License: Apache License 2.0

13. Vagrant

Best for: Creating consistent development environments

Vagrant simplifies creating and managing virtualized development environments using simple configuration files. Works with providers like VirtualBox, VMware, and Docker.

vagrant-homepage.png

Key features:

  • Simple configuration files (Vagrantfile)
  • Multiple provider support (VirtualBox, VMware, Docker)
  • Environment consistency across teams
  • Plugin ecosystem
  • Provisioning integration with Ansible, Chef, Puppet
  • Box sharing and distribution

License: MIT License

How to choose the right Pulumi alternative for your team

This comparison helps you quickly identify which tools match your specific requirements and team structure.

If you need...Consider...Because...
Deployment + operations + infrastructure in one platformNorthflankHandles complete application lifecycle beyond provisioning
Strict compliance with data residency requirementsNorthflank (BYOC), self-hosted OpenTofuKeeps all data within your security boundary
Mature ecosystem with extensive community modulesTerraform, OpenTofuLargest collection of providers and pre-built modules
Zero vendor lock-in with open standardsNorthflank, OpenTofu, CrossplaneBuilt on Kubernetes, Docker, or open-source foundations
AWS-specific infrastructure with programming languagesAWS CDKNative AWS integration with TypeScript, Python, Java support
Multi-cloud without proprietary lock-inOpenTofu, NorthflankWorks across clouds with portable configurations
GitOps-native Kubernetes infrastructureCrossplaneTreats infrastructure as Kubernetes resources
Simple configuration managementAnsibleAgentless with straightforward YAML syntax
Azure-native with modern syntaxBicepCleaner than ARM templates with same-day feature support
Transparent usage-based pricingNorthflankPay for compute resources used, not resource counts

Start with the right foundation

The best alternative depends on your team's needs, technical background, and infrastructure requirements. Traditional IaC tools like Terraform and OpenTofu work well for infrastructure provisioning when you have dedicated DevOps resources. Cloud-specific tools like AWS CDK or Azure Bicep make sense for single-cloud deployments.

If you need more than just infrastructure provisioning, such as deployment pipelines, runtime operations, compliance controls, and developer self-service, platforms like Northflank provide integrated solutions without forcing you into proprietary lock-in.

Try Northflank's free developer sandbox to see how it compares with your current setup, or book a demo with an engineer to discuss your specific requirements.

Share this article with your network
X