← Back to Blog
Header image for blog post: Runpod GPU pricing: A complete breakdown and platform comparison
Deborah Emeni
Published 8th December 2025

Runpod GPU pricing: A complete breakdown and platform comparison

When evaluating Runpod GPU pricing, you're likely comparing costs across GPU cloud providers. Runpod focuses on providing GPU compute infrastructure.

When deploying production AI applications, you need more than GPU compute; you also need databases, APIs, CI/CD pipelines, and monitoring tools to make your deployment work. Total infrastructure costs extend beyond GPU hourly rates.

This guide covers Runpod's pricing structure and compares it with platform alternatives like Northflank to help you evaluate the full picture.

TL;DR: Runpod GPU pricing & platform comparison at a glance

When comparing Runpod and Northflank, you're looking at two different approaches: GPU-only pricing versus platform pricing that bundles everything you need.

Price comparison at a glance

GPU modelRunpod communityRunpod secureNorthflankWhat you're actually comparing
H100 SXM 80GB$2.69/hr$2.69/hr$2.74/hrGPU only vs GPU + full platform
H200$3.59/hr$3.59/hr$3.14/hrNorthflank more affordable here
A100 SXM 80GB$1.39/hr$1.49/hr$1.76/hrLower GPU rate vs bundled infrastructure
A100 40GB$1.19/hr$1.39/hr$1.42/hrComparable across platforms

What this means for your total infrastructure costs:

With Runpod at $2.69/hr for H100 SXM, you still need to add:

  • Database hosting (PostgreSQL, Redis, MongoDB)
  • API server hosting for inference endpoints
  • CI/CD platform for deployments
  • Monitoring and observability tools
  • Integration and management time

With Northflank at $2.74/hr for H100 SXM, these services are included in your platform. You pay $0.05/hr more for the GPU but get databases, APIs, CI/CD, and monitoring bundled, often resulting in lower total costs and faster shipping.

The key question: Which approach fits your team? GPU-only pricing (Runpod) or complete platform (Northflank)?

Request GPU access to compare total costs with your workloads

What is Runpod's GPU pricing structure?

Runpod offers three ways to access GPU compute, each suited for different workload patterns. Let's break down each option.

runpod-homepage.png

Community cloud GPU pricing

Community Cloud connects you to GPUs through a marketplace model. You'll find options across three tiers:

GPU tierGPU modelVRAMPrice per hour
EnterpriseH200141GB$3.59/hr
B200180GB$5.98/hr
H100 SXM80GB$2.69/hr
H100 PCIe80GB$1.99/hr
A100 SXM80GB$1.39/hr
A100 PCIe80GB$1.19/hr
Mid-rangeL40S48GB$0.79/hr
RTX 6000 Ada48GB$0.74/hr
ConsumerRTX 409024GB$0.34/hr
RTX 309024GB$0.22/hr

You're billed per second, which works well when you're running training experiments or short development sessions.

Secure cloud GPU pricing

If your production workloads need enterprise features, Secure Cloud adds $0.10-$0.40/hr for SOC2 compliance and dedicated infrastructure:

GPU ModelCommunity CloudSecure Cloud
H100 PCIe$1.99/hr$2.39/hr
A100 PCIe$1.19/hr$1.39/hr
A100 SXM$1.39/hr$1.49/hr

How does Runpod serverless GPU pricing work?

If you need GPUs that scale automatically based on demand, serverless offers two pricing tiers:

GPU ModelFlex WorkersActive Workers (30% off)
H100$4.18/hr$3.35/hr
A100$2.72/hr$2.17/hr
4090$1.10/hr$0.77/hr

You'll pay 2-3x more than pod pricing, but you get FlashBoot (sub-200ms cold starts) and automatic orchestration. This makes sense for inference APIs or workloads with variable traffic.

What does Runpod charge for storage?

Runpod separates storage costs from GPU compute:

Storage TypePrice
Pod volume (running)$0.10/GB/month
Pod volume (idle)$0.20/GB/month
Network volume (less than 1TB)$0.07/GB/month
Network volume (greater than 1TB)$0.05/GB/month

You won't pay for data ingress or egress, which helps when moving large datasets.

What else will you need beyond GPU compute?

When you deploy production AI applications, GPU compute is just the starting point. Your infrastructure stack will also require:

  • Database hosting - PostgreSQL, Redis, or MongoDB for your application data
  • API servers - Deploy and serve your model inference endpoints
  • Frontend applications - User interfaces for your AI products
  • CI/CD pipelines - Automated deployment and testing workflows
  • Monitoring and observability - Track performance and debug issues
  • Background job processing - Handle async tasks and data processing

Each of these means working with another vendor, managing separate billing, and building integrations. Your GPU cluster needs to connect with all these components to build a complete system.

How does Northflank GPU pricing compare?

Now that you've seen what Runpod offers and what else you'll need to build around it, let's look at how Northflank approaches this differently.

Northflank bundles GPU pricing with the complete development platform you need. Instead of paying for GPUs separately and then stitching together databases, APIs, and CI/CD from other vendors, you get GPU as a service plus all those infrastructure tools in one place.

northflank-ai-homepage-2.png

Northflank GPU pricing breakdown

Here's what you'll pay for GPU and CPU compute on Northflank:

GPU compute:

GPU ModelVRAMPrice per Hour
A100 40GB40GB$1.42/hr
A100 80GB80GB$1.76/hr
H10080GB$2.74/hr
H200141GB$3.14/hr
B200180GB$5.87/hr

CPU compute:

Your API servers, databases, and other services run on CPU instances priced at:

ResourcePrice
vCPU$0.01667/vCPU/hour
Memory$0.00833/GB/hour

Fixed pricing (included in all plans):

These platform services are bundled into every deployment:

ServicePrice
Networking$0.15/GB, $0.50/1M requests
Disk storage$0.30/GB/month
Builds & backups$0.08/GB/month
Logs & metrics$0.20/GB

You're billed per second with transparent pricing. No hidden fees or surprise charges for data transfer.

Want to see how this compares with your current infrastructure costs? Request GPU access to test your workloads, or talk to an engineer about your specific requirements.

Runpod GPU pricing vs Northflank: Direct comparison

Before we compare GPU hourly rates, remember what we covered earlier: Runpod focuses on GPU compute, while Northflank bundles GPUs with your complete infrastructure stack (databases, APIs, CI/CD, monitoring).

So when you're looking at these numbers, you're comparing GPU-only pricing against platform pricing.

Here's how the GPU rates stack up:

GPU modelRunpod CommunityRunpod SecureNorthflankWhat you're actually comparing
H100 SXM 80GB$2.69/hr$2.69/hr$2.74/hrGPU only vs GPU + full platform
H200$3.59/hr$3.59/hr$3.14/hrNorthflank has competitive pricing here
B200$5.98/hr$5.19/hr$5.87/hrSimilar pricing, different scope
A100 SXM 80GB$1.39/hr$1.49/hr$1.76/hrLower GPU rate vs bundled infrastructure
A100 40GB$1.19/hr$1.39/hr$1.42/hrComparable across all platforms

Here's what this means for your infrastructure costs:

If you go with Runpod at $2.69/hr for H100 SXM, you still need to add:

  • Database hosting (PostgreSQL, Redis, MongoDB)
  • API server hosting for inference endpoints
  • CI/CD platform for deployments
  • Monitoring and observability tools
  • Integration and management time

With Northflank at $2.74/hr for H100 SXM, all of those services are included in your platform. You're paying $0.05/hr more for the GPU, but you get databases, APIs, CI/CD, and monitoring bundled together.

The question isn't just "which hourly rate is lower?" but "what's your total infrastructure cost?" For teams building production applications, having everything in one platform often costs less overall and ships faster.

What platform features does Northflank include?

Beyond GPU compute, Northflank provides a full-stack developer platform designed for teams building and deploying AI applications at scale:

CategoryFeatures
Complete application stackGPU workloads (training, inference, fine-tuning), managed databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, Redis, MongoDB), frontend and backend services, background jobs and cron scheduling, static site hosting
Developer workflowNative Git integration (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket), automated CI/CD pipelines, preview environments for every pull request, buildpacks and custom Dockerfiles, Infrastructure as Code support
Production featuresReal-time logs and metrics, auto-scaling based on CPU, memory, or custom metrics, secret management and environment variables, team collaboration with RBAC, audit logs and compliance tracking
Enterprise capabilitiesDeploy in your own cloud (GCP, AWS, Azure, Oracle, CoreWeave, Civo, bare-metal), secure runtime with microVM isolation (gVisor, Kata, Firecracker), 24/7 support and SLA guarantees

This comprehensive platform approach means you're comparing a focused GPU provider against a complete development ecosystem. Both approaches have merit depending on your team's needs.

When does a platform approach make sense?

The choice between focused GPU providers like Runpod and platform solutions depends on your infrastructure needs:

Building production inference APIs

With focused GPU providers:

  • GPU provider for training
  • Separate API hosting service
  • Different database service
  • Another frontend service
  • Additional monitoring tool
  • Integration work between services

With platform approach: Deploy everything in one place. Auto-scaling, automated backups, unified logging. The cloud GPU infrastructure integrates seamlessly with other components.

Managing multiple AI projects

Teams running several AI workloads benefit from unified deployment, consistent monitoring, shared configuration, and preview environments for testing.

Compliance and security requirements

Platform solutions can address this through BYOC capabilities, letting you deploy GPUs in your own cloud while maintaining platform benefits for data residency compliance and enterprise security integration.

Long-term cost optimization

Total cost of ownership includes more than hourly GPU rates. Consolidating multiple vendors can reduce operational complexity, billing relationships, and infrastructure integration time.

Which GPU cloud provider should you choose?

Your decision comes down to your infrastructure needs and team capabilities. Here's how to think about it:

Runpod works well for teams that:Northflank works well for teams that:
Need dedicated GPU access without additional servicesBuild production AI applications
Have experienced DevOps teamsNeed databases, APIs, and GPU compute together
Already maintain separate infrastructureWant to reduce infrastructure management
Run research projects or experimentsHave compliance or data residency requirements
Prioritize lowest per-hour GPU costNeed to deploy in their own cloud
Want widest GPU hardware varietyValue total cost of ownership

Your choice depends on your infrastructure needs and team structure.

Getting started with GPU infrastructure

Understanding total infrastructure costs means looking beyond headline GPU pricing.

Runpod provides competitive compute rates for teams focused on GPU access. Northflank combines GPU pricing with databases, APIs, CI/CD, and deployment tools in one platform.

Need to see how GPU infrastructure integrates with databases, APIs, and deployment tools? Request GPU access to test the platform with your workloads, or book a demo if you have specific organizational requirements.

Frequently asked questions about Runpod GPU pricing

How does Runpod GPU pricing compare to AWS or GCP?

Runpod typically runs 40-60% cheaper than AWS or GCP on-demand instances. Major clouds provide committed use discounts that narrow this gap. Platform solutions like Northflank bridge this by providing competitive GPU pricing while letting you deploy in your own cloud through BYOC.

Does Runpod charge for data transfer?

No, Runpod doesn't charge for ingress or egress data transfer, which helps when moving large datasets or model weights.

What's the difference between Community Cloud and Secure Cloud?

Community Cloud provides more GPU variety at lower prices through a marketplace model. Secure Cloud adds $0.10-$0.40/hr per GPU for SOC2 compliance, dedicated resources, and enhanced support.

Can I use spot instances to reduce costs?

Runpod operates on a marketplace model where prices reflect availability. Other platforms support spot GPUs when deploying in your own cloud for 60-90% savings on interruptible workloads.

Which GPU should I choose for deep learning?

The best GPU for AI depends on your workload. H100 or H200 for large language models and transformer training. A100 or L40S for inference or smaller models. Both Runpod and Northflank provide access to these options.

What's the difference between SXM and PCIe GPUs?

SXM GPUs offer higher performance with faster interconnect speeds (NVLink) and better thermal design, making them ideal for large-scale training. PCIe GPUs cost less but have lower bandwidth. Runpod offers both variants with clear pricing distinctions. When comparing providers, check which form factor is included in the quoted price.

Share this article with your network
X